Natural Gas Fracking: What is Hydrofracking and why should you care?

95

By William R. Wilson

Gasland
Amazon Price: $10.94
List Price: $29.95

Fracking? Frac'ing? Hydrofracking? What?

Hydrofracking, also known as hydraulic fracturing, fracking, frac'ing, or fraccing, is a new way to get natural gas from shale rock.

I recently watched the movie "Gasland", and frankly I was shocked and terrified. I've done some research since then, and here I present some facts about the subject. As always, I will do my best to avoid fearmongering and to deal in solid facts backed up by strong evidence.

Geologists have long known that shale contains natural gas, but traditional drilling methods have not been able to get to the gas. In the past decade, however, a combination of higher natural gas prices, new technologies (fracking and horizontal drilling) and a lack of regulation has allowed gas companies to extract gas from the shale profitably.


How Hydrofracking works

Conventional drilling methods can only remove pooled reservoirs of natural gas and oil. There is a great deal of natural gas trapped in shale rock - and this gas has been unavailable, until now. Hydrofracking breaks up the shale, allowing the gas to escape.

First, as in any gas drilling operation, the vertical well is dug. A vertical well may be all that is needed, but in many cases, the well is turned horizontal once it enters the shale layer. This allows more surface area to be exposed, giving the gas more places to seep into the well.

Once the well is drilled, mini explosives are set off in the shale to create preliminary fractures. A mixture of water, chemicals, and proppants are then pumped into the well at a high pressure. Up to 7 million gallons of water can be used for one frac. The chemicals are added for a variety of reasons - to prevent corrosion of the well casing, to change the water viscosity, etc. The proppant is made up of small particles of sand or other material that will remain in the fractures after the water is pumped out, to hold the fractures open and allow the gas to escape.

So What's the Fracking problem?

The industry wil tell you that fracking is completely safe, but when you dig a little deeper and look into the research and reports that they share with each other (but not with the general public), you'll see that they know quite well what's going on:

"The reasons for more precautions are simple: Horizontal drilling and multi-stage fracing can be disruptive to communities, and accidents have increased as drilling ramps up." -From the report FRAC ATTACK: RISKS, HYPE, AND FINANCIAL REALITY OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING IN THE SHALE PLAYS.

That report is very well done, by the way. The writers tell it like it is and list the facts about hydrofracking very clearly and honestly, from the industry perspective.

So what are the problems with fracking?

Water

Sourcing:

As I mentioned, it can take up to 7 million gallons of water to do one frac job. A single well can be fracked multiple times. To put that amount in perspective: the average American family uses between 30,000 to 40,000 gallons of water in a year. An Olympic size swimming pool contains 600,000 gallons of water.

Disposal:

Once the well has been frac'ed, the water has to go somewhere. The problem is, it contains a host of chemicals, many of which are deadly toxic. So where do you put 7 million gallons of polluted water? And how do you make sure it stays put, forever?

Contaminated drinking water:

There have been many documented cases of drinking wells being contaminated after hydraulic fracturing operations in the area. It is difficult to pin the contamination directly on fracking, but there are a variety of ways that chemicals and natural gas could come into contact with groundwater. My opinion is that most of this contamination occurs when the drillers try to cut costs and don't properly encase their wells to protect the aquifers. This is a result of the boom in hydrofracking and the lack of consistent oversight and regulation.

Climate

Natural gas is supposed to be a cleaner burning fuel than Coal or petroleum, and this was supposed to save us from global warming. But there's a catch: this type of drilling is so energy intensive it has a bigger carbon footprint than coal. A huge amount of water, chemicals, proppants, and equipment must be transported onto the site - all of which is done by gas burning semi trucks.  

Other effects

Air quality can be affected by fracking operations, whether from the massive quantity of heavy rig traffic required or from natural gas, fracking chemicals, and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) escaping from storage onsite.

Communities (human and animal) can be disrupted by the noise, light, and constant activity at a frac site, which can be active 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Habitat fragmentation is created by the drilling pads and roads.

Safety issues - as with any industrial project there is a potential for accidents, from chemical spills to well blowouts. 

Major Shale Gas Plays in the US
Major Shale Gas Plays in the US

Conclusion

Study the map above.  If you think that fracking might be coming to your home, pay close attention.  Hydrofracking can be very dangerous to people who live nearby.

Unfortunately, it probably won't be going away anytime soon.  The fact is, we need natural gas to provide heat and power - until we find cleaner, renewable energy sources.

While personally I am completely opposed to the process because of the many environmental impacts, I retain some hope that it can be done in a (relatively) responsible and safe manner - IF IT IS PROPERLY REGULATED AND OVERSEEN!  Currently, hydrofracking is exempt from major federal laws that protect our clean water:  the Safe Water Drinking Act, The Clean Water Act, and the Clean Air Act.  This means that regulation varies from state to state.  In many places, it may be possible to hydrofrack with no more regulation than you would need for a traditional gas well.

Don't let yourself be fracked over!

Comments

American Romance profile image

American Romance Level 7 Commenter 16 months ago

William, fracking is not new, we do it daily, and have been for many many years with no problems, I too saw the documentary you are refering to. I was amazed that people had natural gas coming into their water wells and were able to light their water, This can only be explained by the area they are living in, meaning it can be possible that natural gas got into their water supply through fracking because of super soft formations down deep. Now the question that comes to mind is why CBS, ABC or the Huffington Post hasnt used this information to shut down drilling? Here in Texas and NM, we have never ruined a water well and there are far many more wells drilled and fracked? ........something fishy about this story.....

Jay 16 months ago

Our need for domestically produced oil and gas is both a national security issue and a jobs issue. The environmental concerns must be addressed, and there is one company headquartered in Calgary, Alberta--Gasfrac Energy Services--which has developed a fracking process which requires no water. Instead, they use a proprietary gelled liquid petroleum gas for fracking. The fracking fluid is almost 100% revoverable while the standard hydrofracking practice leaves about 50% of the water and toxic chemicals in the ground. Perhaps this comapany has developed a process which satisfies the majority of environmental concerns. There will always be those who will oppose fracking regardless of the technology, but this company may have the answer to many of our needs.

William R. Wilson profile image

William R. Wilson Hub Author 16 months ago

American Romance,

Thanks for the comment. I am aware that fracking has been going on for many years. The problem is the lack of regulation. The current fracking boom is a result of better technology, and the so called Halliburton Exemption fromt the 2005 Energy Bill which exempted fracking from the Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act, and the Clean Air Act. Fracking is an old technology that has finally become profitable.

There needs to be better oversight and regulation, period. This sort of oversight could prevent the sort of terrifying problems seen in Gaslans like people lighting their tapwater on fire, and still allow gas companies to make money and meet our energy needs.

William R. Wilson profile image

William R. Wilson Hub Author 16 months ago

Jay,

Thanks for stopping by. I don't really like the idea of injecting jelled petroleum into the ground, anymore than I like using water. Jelled petroleum is napalm... yum.

The real answer to our energy security and independence is two pronged: 1. cut our consumption by retrofitting houses, redesigning our transportation systems, etc. and 2. develop our supply of renewable, clean energy sources so we can stop extracting and burning fossil fuels.

Climate change and environmental destruction is a much bigger threat than terrorism (which is often linked to foreign oil) in the long run.

someonewhoknows profile image

someonewhoknows 16 months ago

There has been a revived energy revolution movement going on around the world the past 20 years that has not been covered or reported by mainstream press, establishment scientific journals or university research publications.

Significant technological breakthroughs that have been suppressed range from modifications of the internal combustion engine to get significantly higher miles per gallon to new electromagnetic generating systems that extract energy from the so-called Quantum Vacuum.

sir slave profile image

sir slave 16 months ago

awesome essay william,

I had seen some excerpts from "fracland"

I mean gas land, but your piece is more detailed than anything explained on the news.

I am an environmentalist who owns the waterway in the picture you see! I want to start a local woodland protection group as I live smack in the middle of the Shasta-trinity national forest. check out my first hub

called "the prospects of tree farming in n. cal."

my question is can much gas be extracted from these western regions without that huge waste of water?

I'm all for propane replacing gasoline(in the interim of course) whereever possible. but NG traveling through the aquafers is not an option.

William R. Wilson profile image

William R. Wilson Hub Author 16 months ago

Someonewhoknows: I'm eagerly awaiting some of that new technology. I'm sure that it would be possible to design cars that get better mileage and last longer but market forces have kept these innovations from being produced.

William R. Wilson profile image

William R. Wilson Hub Author 16 months ago

sir slave: I am trying to figure out if hydrofracking will be an issue in Tennessee, where I live. The shale in every region is going to be a little different.

So far in Tennessee, there has been fracking but it has been so called "dry fracking" using nitrogen gas instead of water and chemicals. This is because the shale is thinner and not buried as deep as the Marcellus shale, so proppants aren't needed to keep the fractures open after fracking.

Of course, just because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it won't, and there are other layers of shale that might come online in a few years as gas prices go up, and at that time we might see hydrofracking here.

So if you live in California, I would advise you to contact the state agencies that regulate gas drilling and water quality and ask them. But I can tell you from experience that they may not know or may not want to tell you the whole truth.

So, learn about shale geology. What kind of shale do you have where you live? How deeply buried is it? Is it a thick layer, more than 100 feet thick? Is it hydrocarbon-rich shale? Compare the properties of the shale where you live to the Marcellus shale, the Barnett Shale, and the Fayetteville shale, which are the major shale gas plays which have required hydrofracking in the US.

good luck!

Calgary, AB 16 months ago

Frac'in with propane...insane!!!!

Best scientific info from an expert on Frac'ing can be found at :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_05A3Rr4t0

PROPANE FRAC GONE BAD

GASFRAC Energy Services Inc. Announces Incident Investigation

http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/200954#ixzz1BK8Bq//www.digitaljournal.com/pr/200954#ixzz1BK8BqLm3

CALGARY, ALBERTA--(Marketwire - Jan. 16, 2011) - GASFRAC Energy Services Inc. ("GASFRAC") (TSX VENTURE:GFS) announces that an incident occurred on a location that resulted in a propane leak that was quickly contained. As a result of the leak there was an ignition that resulted in a short fire that damaged the back end of two fracturing pumpers. Three employees incurred minor burns, two have been released from hospital and the other has been asked to stay for further examination of second degree burns on his hands.

GASFRAC is working with the occupational health and safety authorities and the operator to complete a thorough investigation of the incident. As a precautionary measure, GASFRAC has suspended operations until the root cause of the leak has been identified and necessary corrective actions initiated. At that time an updated press release will be issued detailing the actions to be taken.

GASFRAC is an oil and gas service company headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, whose primary business is to provide LPG fracturing services to oil and gas companies in Canada and the USA.

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/200954#ixzz1BKhN0

William R. Wilson profile image

William R. Wilson Hub Author 16 months ago

Calgary - that Youtube video is great, thank you! Thanks for dropping by.

Calgary, AB 16 months ago

No worries...good luck to you.

DTR0005 profile image

DTR0005 16 months ago

I have seen the burning tap water first-hand and it is a little scary.

William R. Wilson profile image

William R. Wilson Hub Author 16 months ago

A little scary? LOL. I get nervous when my gas heater makes noises. I would be freaked out completely if my water was burning!

cathstuff79 profile image

cathstuff79 15 months ago

Excellent hub, well researched and very informative, thank you

LillyGrillzit profile image

LillyGrillzit Level 1 Commenter 15 months ago

Awesome Hub on hydro-fracking. I appreciate this Hub. Thanks for linking my Fracking Hub. Are you watching the earthquake activity? If you FOIA Gov. Beebe's approval for Earthquake monitoring equipment that was costly. 6 of them right when the Fayetteville Shale program took off. Coincidence?

Lawyer For You profile image

Lawyer For You 10 months ago

Very informative Hub! Fracking has been such a huge (and controversial) topic in the media lately. We will most likely post a Hub on fracking in the near future. Thank you for sharing this information!

zane 7 months ago

i am sure this is already being done, but what about fracking with N2, membrane and compressors, after going through HP boosters?? 95%N2 and with a flow rate of 22,000 cfm at say 10,000 psi, would this not be safer??

William R. Wilson profile image

William R. Wilson Hub Author 7 months ago

Ha Zane. This is already being done, depending on the formation. Uses less water, still creates environmental problems but it's admittedly not as bad as high volume slickwater hydrofracking.

Nawar 3 months ago

The solution for fraccing pollution is waterless fraccing; Gasfrac has done over a 1000 fracs with gelled propane; you don’t need any water; you don’t produce any waste fluids (no need for injection wells); no need to flare (no CO2 emissions); truck traffic is cut to a trickle from 900+ trips per well for water fraccing to 30 with propane fracs; and on top of that the process increases oil and gas production; it is a win for the industry, a win for the community and a win for the environment.

watergeek profile image

watergeek Level 2 Commenter 6 weeks ago

Lilly - I've wondered about the connection between earthquakes and human activity underground too. Found out just now that the US has developed and dropped underground bombs designed to simulate earthquakes - used them during the Gulf War (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthquake_bomb). But I didn't see anything about underground explosives or drilling causing earthquakes themselves. It would be interesting to know.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working